Go Back   TeamTalk > Maintenance Tips, How-tos and Refurbishing Topics > Ballast

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-28-2014, 05:00 PM
ac505 ac505 is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Boat: 2000 Xstar
Location: somewhere cold and wet
Posts: 139
How many pumps can efficiently run via one thru hole?

I added a jabsco pump to the old star last year, 3/4" thru hole with 1" hose feeding both rear sacs via a valved tee. Fill time is not a big deal for me so no need for lots of pumps.

That said, I want to add a sac up front so I have two options, run a diverter valve on the current setup or add a new pump. If I ran a diverter I am asking one pump to fill about 1300lbs ballast and to be able to tune this it would become a pain as I would be manually opening and closing valves . So the easier option is to run a second pump. For ease, I could run this second pump from the same 3/4 thru hole or go down the route of a second thru hole. How much would running the second pump through existing fitting throttle it down by? Do I need to add a second thru hole??

Or, as a totally different option, could I repurpose the vent from the KGB sac and piggy back the new sac up front? Bearing in mind the KGB is run via an aerator I am not sure if this will work. Certainly the cheapest option...

Last edited by ac505; 06-28-2014 at 05:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-28-2014, 09:49 PM
swatguy's Avatar
swatguy swatguy is offline
MC Devotee
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Boat: 2000 X-star
Location: Midwest, Chicago
Posts: 1,801
Cheapest and best option is adding a second thru hull. It's the most efficient and will require the least amount of check valves and diversions. Go simple and just be done. While drilling through a perfectly good boat is mind numbing, once you get passed that you will appreciate having that second thru hull
__________________
Current: 2008 Super Air 210TE

Previous : 2000 X-Star, 3000lbs ballast, LTR 330, Acme 1235 14.5X14.25prop. 1200 hrs of flawless fun
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-29-2014, 07:25 AM
KahunaCraft's Avatar
KahunaCraft KahunaCraft is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Boat: 2012 X30, 6L
Location: Canada
Posts: 437
I believe that the 1" only supports one jabsco at a time. You will burn impellers running two, go extra thru hull and save a lot of time.

You can get a double seacock thru hull and add two pumps to it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-29-2014, 04:37 PM
ac505 ac505 is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Boat: 2000 Xstar
Location: somewhere cold and wet
Posts: 139
Cheers for the input. Looking at the cheapo option which would hopefully work until I have time to install another thru hole and dedicated pump. I have a diverter valve lying around from my old nauti, so can build this in for free. I am thinking I could piggy back the vent line on the centre sac to feed another sac. The only thing on my mind is that the second sac is above the floor and I'm not sure what pumping head an aerator can work with?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-29-2014, 05:49 PM
KahunaCraft's Avatar
KahunaCraft KahunaCraft is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Boat: 2012 X30, 6L
Location: Canada
Posts: 437
My advice, don't piggy off the center tank unless you know how to vent it properly. If you mess up the venting, you'll collapse the hard tank and it will crack. That is a big problem that you'll want to avoid.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-30-2014, 02:35 AM
swatguy's Avatar
swatguy swatguy is offline
MC Devotee
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Boat: 2000 X-star
Location: Midwest, Chicago
Posts: 1,801
kahuna he should have a bladder style center sac. Not a hard tank.


I know plenty of guys that ran the vent/overflow from that center sac to a bow sac. The aerator can push it up that way. You'll want to put a ball valve somewhere between the center sac and the bow sac because when that bow sac gets filled the back pressure will most likely leak back out the fill pump. I am not certain it will.....kind of depends how big of a sac you are going to fill..... So you can always try and see if that extra sac looses it water then you'll know it's pushing back out the fill line and need to add the ball valve.

Emptying is easy as all that water from the bow sac will easily run back down to your ski locker sac by pure gravity so that empty pump will empty both.

The only down side to doing this is that the fill rate of that bow sac will take twice as long as the center sac even if it's the same size because the pump looses its efficiency when it has to push water through that vent hole up to the bow sac.
__________________
Current: 2008 Super Air 210TE

Previous : 2000 X-Star, 3000lbs ballast, LTR 330, Acme 1235 14.5X14.25prop. 1200 hrs of flawless fun
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-30-2014, 05:57 PM
ac505 ac505 is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Boat: 2000 Xstar
Location: somewhere cold and wet
Posts: 139
Granted regarding the fill time. What about swapping out the cartridge on the fill pump to a 1000gph?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-01-2014, 02:32 AM
swatguy's Avatar
swatguy swatguy is offline
MC Devotee
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Boat: 2000 X-star
Location: Midwest, Chicago
Posts: 1,801
Easily done you won't gain the full 1000gph because that requires a 1inch out but it will still be way faster than the stock which I believe was 500 if not 750
__________________
Current: 2008 Super Air 210TE

Previous : 2000 X-Star, 3000lbs ballast, LTR 330, Acme 1235 14.5X14.25prop. 1200 hrs of flawless fun
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-01-2014, 11:46 AM
ac505 ac505 is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Boat: 2000 Xstar
Location: somewhere cold and wet
Posts: 139
just checked, it would appear both fill and drain are indeed 1000GPH. I'll piggy back the bow sac for now and take it from there. I'm only running 2x450lbs in the rear and have around 500lbs lead distributed under the helm, passenger seat and into the bow so I am not convinced that I will need to go the whole way and run the 450lb sac in the walkway too. Maybe I could keep a little more lead in the rear however and fill it...........
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-01-2014, 01:28 PM
swatguy's Avatar
swatguy swatguy is offline
MC Devotee
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Boat: 2000 X-star
Location: Midwest, Chicago
Posts: 1,801
Depending on what line length and speed you run that 450 in the nose should really change up your wake. It will harden up the lip a bit and really give you a solid boot. It will also help you cran up the forth at lower speeds so you can ride a longer line. This boat loves bow weight

Give that 450 a fill before you plumb it and I guarantee it will make huge difference. To be quite honest if you are not doing any skiing the boat cruises across the lake and handles chop much better with a little weight towards the bow. I always leave my KGB full and about 200 lbs of pop bags in the nose. If you don't have to tow very far leaving that 450 filled in the walkway permanently could be an option
__________________
Current: 2008 Super Air 210TE

Previous : 2000 X-Star, 3000lbs ballast, LTR 330, Acme 1235 14.5X14.25prop. 1200 hrs of flawless fun
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:09 PM.