The NFL

[scott023]

Originally Posted by JimN

Normally, 1000 yards passing in one game means the defense sucks but they were both threading the needle really well.

One of the most exciting games I have seen in a long time. Too many stupid screw-ups on the Packers side, though. I'm glad they yanked Lee.

They, like the other SuperBowl contenders, have some real defensive issues.

[scott023]

43 passing yards for Tebow... A loss and they're in the playoffs though. That was another ugly performance...

[PA Prostar]

Now to back up my statement that Aikman in Canton is a joke, here are his numbers vs. others that are not in Canton and their numbers, GP = games played

Aikman GP165, YDS 32942 TD 165, INT 141, RATING 81.6
Ken Anderson GP 192, YDS 32838, TD 197, INT 160, RATING 81.9
Randal Cunningham GP 161, 29979, TD 207, INT 134, RATING 81.5
BOOMER Esiason GP 187, YDS 37920, TD 247, INT 184 RATING 81.1
Phil Sims GP 164, YDS 33462, TD 199, INT 157, RATING 78.5
Dave Krieg GP 213, YDS 38147, TD 261, INT 199, RATING 81.5

So, if Aikman played on one of the best rushing teams ever (Emmit Smith) and his numbers aren't that great, why is he in Canton? So he was on a great team, so what. If anything Dave Krieg should have been in there LONG before Aikman. So should have Esiason based on yards passing and TD's.

There's always going to be a place at my dinner table for you if you ever need it. Also, just saying, McNabb is statistically better then all of the above.

[captain planet]

Originally Posted by PA Prostar

Now to back up my statement that Aikman in Canton is a joke, here are his numbers vs. others that are not in Canton and their numbers, GP = games played

Aikman GP165, YDS 32942 TD 165, INT 141, RATING 81.6
Ken Anderson GP 192, YDS 32838, TD 197, INT 160, RATING 81.9
Randal Cunningham GP 161, 29979, TD 207, INT 134, RATING 81.5
BOOMER Esiason GP 187, YDS 37920, TD 247, INT 184 RATING 81.1
Phil Sims GP 164, YDS 33462, TD 199, INT 157, RATING 78.5
Dave Krieg GP 213, YDS 38147, TD 261, INT 199, RATING 81.5

So, if Aikman played on one of the best rushing teams ever (Emmit Smith) and his numbers aren't that great, why is he in Canton? So he was on a great team, so what. If anything Dave Krieg should have been in there LONG before Aikman. So should have Esiason based on yards passing and TD's.

There's always going to be a place at my dinner table for you if you ever need it. Also, just saying, McNabb is statistically better then all of the above.

Dinner at 6:00?

I wanted to say you were wrong on McNabb....but you are not.

McNabb
GP 167, YDS 37276, TD 234, INT 117, RATING 85.6. 223.2 yards per game average.

Based on this, I wouldn't have a problem with him in Canton. He is more deserving than Aikman.

[captain planet]

Have I mentioned that the BENGALS are in teh playoffs?

WHO DEY!!!!!

[GT500 MC]

Originally Posted by captain planet

Dinner at 6:00?

I wanted to say you were wrong on McNabb....but you are not.

McNabb
GP 167, YDS 37276, TD 234, INT 117, RATING 85.6. 223.2 yards per game average.

Based on this, I wouldn't have a problem with him in Canton. He is more deserving than Aikman.

McNabb should be in. I know he's had a rough couple of years to say the least, but it shouldn't tarnish what he's done prior to that.

[GT500 MC]

Originally Posted by captain planet

Have I mentioned that the BENGALS are in teh playoffs?

WHO DEY!!!!!

The Bengals are way underrated. They are going to beat the Texans and then give the Pats all they can handle.

[Cloaked]

Originally Posted by GT500 MC

The Bengals are way underrated. They are going to beat the Texans and then give the Pats all they can handle.

Stop it.... how can you fix your mouth to say something like that?

As much as I'd like to see the Pats go out in the first game, it's not going to happen....

.

[GT500 MC]

Originally Posted by Cloaked

Stop it.... how can you fix your mouth to say something like that?

As much as I'd like to see the Pats go out in the first game, it's not going to happen....

.

Trust me, I had to re-read it myself about ten times before hitting Submit Reply. The Texans are banged up and not playing great and I think Cinci has been flying under the radar. I'm not a fan of either team so really un-biased here, just think they are a team that could get on a little roll.

[tex]

Originally Posted by PA Prostar

Now to back up my statement that Aikman in Canton is a joke, here are his numbers vs. others that are not in Canton and their numbers, GP = games played

Aikman GP165, YDS 32942 TD 165, INT 141, RATING 81.6
Ken Anderson GP 192, YDS 32838, TD 197, INT 160, RATING 81.9
Randal Cunningham GP 161, 29979, TD 207, INT 134, RATING 81.5
BOOMER Esiason GP 187, YDS 37920, TD 247, INT 184 RATING 81.1
Phil Sims GP 164, YDS 33462, TD 199, INT 157, RATING 78.5
Dave Krieg GP 213, YDS 38147, TD 261, INT 199, RATING 81.5

So, if Aikman played on one of the best rushing teams ever (Emmit Smith) and his numbers aren't that great, why is he in Canton? So he was on a great team, so what. If anything Dave Krieg should have been in there LONG before Aikman. So should have Esiason based on yards passing and TD's.

There's always going to be a place at my dinner table for you if you ever need it. Also, just saying, McNabb is statistically better then all of the above.

Rings baby! Rings baby!