Go Back   TeamTalk > General MasterCraft Topics > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-12-2013, 08:55 PM
Jesujoma Jesujoma is offline
TT Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Boat: 2001 PS 195, 79 Ski Supreme PCM 351
Location: Northeast
Posts: 19
93' 205 vs 2003 19 skier

Hi All,

Time to upgrade from our 79' 19'. Our family is use to the solid wake of the older ski boat and limited observer space of the closed bow. We often ski with 3 ppl in the boat plus skier and are on a small lake. Never had any start issues with our carbed engine. We now have access to running a course with skiier speeds from 30-36 mph up to 22 off.

We have heard a lot about the good wake and seating in the 93' carbed 205, and there is one locally available. A local 2003 19' skier came available with very low hours and $4K more but we are having a hard time to find info on how that hull would ski compared with the 93' 205. I think a 197 is out of our price range $18K
Has anyone skied both these hulls? Opinions?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-12-2013, 09:10 PM
Bouyhead's Avatar
Bouyhead Bouyhead is offline
MC Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Boat: 1996 PS 190
Location: NYC
Posts: 902
Get ready, you are about to be bombarded with info.
__________________
1996 ProStar 190
PCM ZR6 W/ Zero Off
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-12-2013, 09:36 PM
aswile aswile is offline
TT Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Boat: 2003 Prostart 197
Location: northeast
Posts: 46
I have owned both- I like the way the 197 looks but prefer the 93 205 for ride and acceleration/top speed. My 197 has the MCX and my 205 had the 285hp 351. Outside of the looks and a few creature comforts, I would choose the 205 over the 197.

Andy
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-12-2013, 10:06 PM
madcityskier's Avatar
madcityskier madcityskier is offline
MC Devotee
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Boat: 85 Stars&Stripes, safe-t-top, trick realease, boom, flitepipe pylon
Location: madison, wi
Posts: 1,680
The space of the 205 is great, and the wake is nice, but if you don't need the space the skier will have the better wake. What are you using it for? If you're entertaining the 205, skiing only, that's why they call it the Skier. With 3+ skier it'll still be crowded in the skier though.
__________________
I spent most of my money on booze, broads and boats. The rest I wasted. - Elmore Leonard
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-13-2013, 02:15 PM
mig mig is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Boat: 1991 prostar190
Location: Montana
Posts: 296
had a 91 PS and currently 2002 skier. the tbi is great improvement over carb in my opinion and much reduced spray as lines get shorter, better tracking and harder to slow in the course, more freeboard n feels roomier but still a closed bow. Don't really remember the slow or long wakes being any better on the 91. no experience with 205.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-13-2013, 05:39 PM
Cloaked Cloaked is offline
MC Maniac
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Boat: MasterCraft
Location: Kingston,TN USA
Posts: 4,594
The 93 205 will give you a very good wake, maybe better than the 79 hull. I've skied both, and owned a 79 for a good while.

.
__________________
93 190
.
Don't be a boot licker
.

Hose picture (internal) http://www.mastercraft.com/teamtalk/...68&postcount=8



Quote:
Originally Posted by Thrall View Post
..Some of you give a whole new meaning to the phrase "another @sshole with a Mastercraft."

RE: Thrall, Welcome to the club....
NEW SKINS in TN... Leading Edge Marine Interior

feedback on a TN company: http://www.mastercraft.com/teamtalk/...ad.php?t=58767

.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-13-2013, 08:24 PM
Jesujoma Jesujoma is offline
TT Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Boat: 2001 PS 195, 79 Ski Supreme PCM 351
Location: Northeast
Posts: 19
Thanks for the feedback!! The 205 is sounding like it may be our better route given the ski wake and passenger room within our budget . Please let me know if anyone knows of a 2004 -2005 205 that is on the market. I see many 2002-2003's 205's with carbed engines, but I might as well look for an EFI if possible. We are in Ontario so northern USA would be only a day's drive.
Thanks again
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 PM.