Go Back   TeamTalk > General MasterCraft Topics > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-28-2013, 04:58 PM
tommydbouy's Avatar
tommydbouy tommydbouy is offline
TT Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Boat: 2009 X-15, MCX
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 68
MCX vs RTP in an X15

I'm looking to buy a used X15. I've mainly been targeting them with the 350 hp MCX. I've heard from more than one dealer that there is very little difference in perfromance on the 310hp RTP and the 350 hp MCX. Since they are both 5.7l the torque curves are similar and the "true hp" on the MCX is overstated. They claim the MCX will just have about 1 mph higher topspeed.

Can anyone confirm or deny this with data? Are the torque curves published anywhere?

Better yet, anyone driven an X15 or similar size boat with the both engine options?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-28-2013, 05:02 PM
willyt's Avatar
willyt willyt is offline
MC Devotee
 
Join Date: May 2009
Boat: ER xstar
Location: high in the middle and round on both ends
Posts: 1,864
What year are we talking?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-28-2013, 05:11 PM
tommydbouy's Avatar
tommydbouy tommydbouy is offline
TT Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Boat: 2009 X-15, MCX
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by willyt View Post
What year are we talking?
2007 to 2010 with my ideal being a 2009

Does it make a difference year to year?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-28-2013, 05:13 PM
rgardjr1's Avatar
rgardjr1 rgardjr1 is offline
MC Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Boat: Mastercraft, Maristar 200 SS, 2006, 5.7L Crusader
Location: Liberty Lake, WA
Posts: 988
I've seen this come up a few times around here when some one is X-2 shopping. I remember reading in those threads that most of the difference between the RTP and MCX was near the top end. I think the right prop will help. It would definitely be worth demoing the boat to see how well it performs. I rarely get my boat above 28 mphs so the ability to do 38 vs 40 mph means very little to me and how I drive. Much more concerned about how well it does pulling some one out of the water on a deep water start with ballast.
__________________
2006 Maristar 200 SS

Last edited by rgardjr1; 02-28-2013 at 06:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-28-2013, 05:23 PM
ZachDaddy's Avatar
ZachDaddy ZachDaddy is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Boat: MasterCraft, X15, 2007, MCX, Acme 5 Blade, Pair of WetSounds Rev410's, WetSounds SD6, 2 JL 12w6v2 subs in sealed box, JL HD750/1, WS402SQ
Location: Southeast
Posts: 250
I have the MCX engine in my 07 X15 and last season put the Acme 5 blade prop. I can still run over 40 mph but not by much.

We are running 3500 lbs in ballast.

I will say that the Moomba XLV I had with the 340hp motor was WAY stronger than the mcx
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-28-2013, 06:32 PM
sand2snow22's Avatar
sand2snow22 sand2snow22 is offline
MC Maniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Boat: MC
Location: p-town
Posts: 3,814
That's b/c the Moomba is WAY lighter...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-01-2013, 08:56 PM
captain planet's Avatar
captain planet captain planet is offline
MC Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Boat: 1998 Prostar 190 Anniversary, LT1
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 5,617
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZachDaddy View Post
I have the MCX engine in my 07 X15 and last season put the Acme 5 blade prop. I can still run over 40 mph but not by much.

We are running 3500 lbs in ballast.

I will say that the Moomba XLV I had with the 340hp motor was WAY stronger than the mcx
Quote:
Originally Posted by sand2snow22 View Post
That's b/c the Moomba is WAY lighter...
Yea, exactly, the engine in the moomba is pushing around half the boat the MCX is.
__________________
1998 ProStar 190 30th Anniversary, Corvette LT-1, STARS AND STRIPES BABY (with a really bad bimini)!!!!!!** * Footin' anyone?
RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT

"The truth is treason in the 'empire of lies'" - Ron Paul
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-2013, 09:38 PM
kgrove kgrove is offline
MC Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Boat: 2011 X-25
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 579
I have not been in an RTP powered X-15 to give you the exact answer you are looking for, but I can say that the MCX engine performs very well in the X-15, even when fairly heavily weighted. With the MCX if you put more than maybe 2500 or 3000 lbs of ballast in, you may want to consider a more aggressive prop to get on plane a little faster, but it makes it.

I'm answering your question indirectly by saying the MCX has room to spare, so if the RTP has similar torque to the MCX I would think it would work fine (especially if you're willing to put on a different prop). If you always weight the crap out of your boat, maybe you'd want to stick with the MCX, but I think the advice to get a bigger engine applies to all boats if you're the type that weights them heavily.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-02-2013, 12:53 AM
iplount iplount is offline
TT Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Boat: Mastercraft x-15 2008
Location: CA Bay Area East Bay
Posts: 65
I have a 2008 X15 with the MCX. I have been very happy with it. I don't have much to compare to, other than my first boat a bayliner with a V8 mercruiser, but when looking I figure the more HP the better. Anyway it has been a great boat for me and my use. I couldn't ask for more from a boat. That being said if I was in the market now looking for used and found a good deal with a RTP and all else consider, condition of boat, hours, etc. I'm sure I would be happy just because the boat itself, layout, size, etc. is great. If this is one of those purchases that is kinda a big deal for you and won't be doing it again anytime soon I would wait and get exactly what you want. If you don't you will always have that little needling in the back of your mind about it. At least I would. Can you say obsessive much?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-02-2013, 02:14 AM
501s's Avatar
501s 501s is offline
MC Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Boat: 2013 X-30, 6.0L, 2500lbs of Ballast, 650lbs of Lead.
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 688
I had the 340 in my XLV (23 footer weighing in at 3600lbs) and agree that engine ran that boat great. We would put 2600 in ballast and it was no problem for that motor.

I really believe that the Ilmor 5.7 that I had in my 2012 X-30 was more powerful than the Indmar I had in my XLV though.
__________________
2013 X-30, 6.0L with 2500lbs of ballast and 500 lbs of lead.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27 PM.