Go Back   TeamTalk > Maintenance Tips, How-tos and Refurbishing Topics > Underwater Running Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-11-2005, 11:29 AM
PendO's Avatar
PendO PendO is offline
MC Maniac
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Boat: 06 197 1.26:1 MCX (Gone but not forgotten)
Location: Below Canada, Left of Idaho
Posts: 3,561
Prop Size / Gear Reduction / theory v actual

Okay, so I have been trying to wrap my brain around the "theoretical" preformance differences caused by prop sizes. From the usawaterski.com website I can see what boats are AWSA approved http://www.usawaterski.org/graphics/...edTowboats.pdf and I found a good site to explain the basic prop terminology: http://www.acepropeller.com/clinic.asp , and a waterskimag.com online article about props and powerslot http://www.waterskimag.com/article.jsp?ID=12547

So ... is top speed reduced by powerslot/gear reduction in the M/C's and CC's, or is it the design of the hull that stands in the way of 50+mph? (Can I / Should I get a 13.7 X 17 for days when we are crusing, not skiing?)

Theory question: If you had two props with the same diameter, but one was a 13.7 X 15 and one was a 13.7 X 17 ... if they used the same gear reduction then the 13.7 X 17 would be faster at the same RPM's, right?

Looking at the engine/gear reduction combos for M/C I see that in 2005 the 15 is on the MCX 1.26:1 and the 17 is on the 1.56:1 ... when topped out does the LQ9 turn more RPM's than the MCX? Why not put the 1.26:1 in the LQ9? (did that change for 06?)

If someone wanted more mph in the 197 with MCX could they put on the 13.7 X 17 ... it would decrease the holeshot (increase the pitch), but once you got up to speed you would see a 13% increase (17/15) in the distance that the 17 should move in the same # of rotations as the 15?

Thanks for the input, time to watch some football

Editing - http://mymastercraft.com/Forum/view_...347&category=2 ... I like this thread on the mymc board, although I need to use a handheld gps to calibrate b/c our spedo never shows 48mph in the X-Star with the 14.5 X 21;(
__________________
At least you know one person who collected from the Cash Rewards program

Last edited by PendO; 09-11-2005 at 02:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-11-2005, 09:32 PM
PendO's Avatar
PendO PendO is offline
MC Maniac
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Boat: 06 197 1.26:1 MCX (Gone but not forgotten)
Location: Below Canada, Left of Idaho
Posts: 3,561
bump..........................................
__________________
At least you know one person who collected from the Cash Rewards program
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-11-2005, 09:43 PM
whitedog's Avatar
whitedog whitedog is offline
MC Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Boat: maibu sportster
Location: somewhere
Posts: 800
What you are gussing is mostly correct. The two factors that you will not know forsure until you try differnt sizes is how your RPM will be affected. Often when goint to a higher pitched prop you will loose 200 - 400 RPM at WOT. This may or may not contribute to a faster top end. All depends how close to max RPM the boat runs now at WOT. Crusing economy should be better with a higher pitched prop but if you try to pull multiple skiers it will make a big difference in hole shot. Best way to find out is to demo several sizes and makes, they all perform differnt. Also a 4 blade vs a 3 blade vs a 3 blade CNC all can make big changes with in a given diameter and pitch.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 AM.