header |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
425 hp/454 ci is really pushing it for a stock production engine. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thats what I was thinking Hollywood. 330 on base, 4 and change on the HO. Good luck convincing them of that...
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
State Farm wanted double what I am getting using Ski Safe via Geico. I think the Ski Safe policy is much more robust as well.
__________________
94 Prostar 190, LT-1, Powerslot |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
CMW,
There were two 454's. Both were 7.4 litre. One was coined an HO. Here are some specs. Both the same Displ. 7.4 / 454 CID Bore & Stroke 4.25 x 4.00 comp ratio 8.8:1 Block GM Fuel Sys Holley 4 barrel Not the same RPM HO version turns 200 more per min. @ 4600 HO was a left hand rotation only. Net weight of engines are identical. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Already sold.
__________________
1997 Prostar 190, TBI 350, 1:1, OJ XMP 13 x 11.5, Stargazer, Hot Shower, Heated Drivers Seat, Reuben/Mountain Rock/Nite Navy |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Voyager Marine Ins. underwritten by Progressive has been a great deal for us with no layup.
__________________
Previous: 1993 Prostar 205 Red 1998 Closed Bow Ski Boat, Ford 351, 310 hp, Acme 4 blade, Perfect Pass SG. FAQ Tyler Ski Club To me, this forum is about love of inboard boats. It is about the sharing of information and, on a good day, some humor. It is not about post count, brand of boat, or any other superfluous labels that lend themselves to a false sense of superiority. Please, respect one another, try to pass on accurate information, and keep your eye on the ball. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't need to be convinced, my insurance company does. I am being charged for 475hp motor right now for a boat that will probably never go above 40 mph. If your thinking I want to impress somebody, I would have bought something besides a 19 year old boat. TMCno1 had brochures that stated 325-375hp. This is why I question it. I am quite happy with the power of the boat. I am 6'5" 210lbs and it will get me up quick. I am not a spring chicken and have back issues from years of abusing it, so the faster I get up, the more I can ski.
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
I do appreciate all the reply's about insurance. I have already gotten some cheaper quotes. None of them asked engine size. I hope this will not be a problem when they check out the hull identification number.
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think everyone in this thread is trying to help you. I didn't see TMCno1 post in this thread but 325-375 sounds much more reasonable. Now I'm wondering if 425 was just a 325 typo somewhere along the way (not just this thread). I also noticed Jim@BAWS failed to throw out HP numbers...
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|