Go Back   TeamTalk > Maintenance Tips, How-tos and Refurbishing Topics > Ballast

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-22-2017, 12:10 PM
Soder's Avatar
Soder Soder is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Boat: 2004 X-30 MCX
Location: Utah
Posts: 108
Question Is 1 1/2" Thru Hull Enough?

I'm adding the Wakemakers TankBuster to my 2004 X30 and was ready to add 2 more thru hulls to make sure I had enough water to run all 3 factory pumps at the same time.

As I was surveying the hull and where I would add the other two thru hulls, I noticed that my current inlet is 1 1/2 inches.

Now, I'm no math or plumbing expert, but assuming the inside diameter of these hoses is the hose size, I have a 1 1/2 inlet hose feeding 3, 3/4" pump hoses. If not, close enough...

The surface area of a 1.5" circle is 1.77 in/sq. The surface area of a 3/4" circle is 0.44 in/sq.

Question #1 - So 3, 3/4" hoses together is 1.32. That being less that 1.77, shouldn't the 1.5" thru hull supply be enough to feed those 3 pumps?

Question #2 - If the distribution manifold is a bottleneck and not the intake, I could do some plumbing magic, get rid of the manifold, and not need extra thru hulls, right?
Attached Images
 
__________________
2004 X-30 5.7L MCX
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-22-2017, 12:30 PM
Keith2230's Avatar
Keith2230 Keith2230 is offline
MC Devotee
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Boat: 2006 X-30 MCX
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,047
There's a manifold and some one way valves if yours is like mine. That complicates your fluid dynamics math. WakeMakers recommends the 1" feed per pump because it's easy to plumb and the fill times are improved with this set up.

Could you come up with a faster solution using the existing 1 1/2? Possibly and I'd be interested in seeing what you did and what your results are. If you don't want the trial and error the 1" thru hull per pump is proven to be faster by several on this site.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-30-2017, 02:11 PM
pondo pondo is offline
TT Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Boat: 2005 Mastercraft X-2
Location: VA
Posts: 75
1-1/2 inch line should have no issues filling 3 bags at a time @ ~12gpm each. See the attached head losses from Cameron Hydraulic Data handbook (fluid dynamics holy grail). It's not polyethylene pipe of course but it's close enough and doesn't include pressure loss through fittings/checks etc. Your largest loss is in the 3/4" pipe, going to 1" as noted above is a good idea. Your approach for surface area makes sense.
Attached Images
  
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-30-2017, 03:34 PM
CheeseSteak1's Avatar
CheeseSteak1 CheeseSteak1 is offline
MC Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Boat: 2009 X30 MCX / 2003 X2 MCX
Location: Midwest
Posts: 975
Add the extra thru hulls and plumb 1" hose throughout. It will be a dramatic improvement on your fill/drain time.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-30-2017, 09:16 PM
Soder's Avatar
Soder Soder is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Boat: 2004 X-30 MCX
Location: Utah
Posts: 108
Pondo, thanks for the engineering perspective on this. Not being an engineer, I don't know what to think about head losses but will take your word that we are good there.

Strangely my boat is plumbed with the 1 1/2" hose from the thru-hull to the manifold, 1" hose from the manifold to the pumps, and 3/4" hose from the pumps to the ballast tanks (soon to be bags). I'm not sure why they reduced the hose to 3/4" at the pumps but I am replacing the 3/4" with 1" with the bag installation per your recommendation.

CheeseSteak1, since it costs me basically nothing to try to maximize what I've got without drilling holes in my boat, I'm going to see how it works. If it takes less than 10 minutes per bag I think I'll leave things be. We always trailer our boat so i've got 10 minutes or so to fill while my wife parks the truck/trailer and another 5-10 to fill while we get things setup. In the end, you might be right.

Thanks to both of you (and Keith2230) for the responses!
__________________
2004 X-30 5.7L MCX
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-30-2017, 10:46 PM
CheeseSteak1's Avatar
CheeseSteak1 CheeseSteak1 is offline
MC Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Boat: 2009 X30 MCX / 2003 X2 MCX
Location: Midwest
Posts: 975
If you have time than it's no loss or gain. I just get impatient when setting up. My fill/drain time is 4:45 with everything plumbed with 1" lines, independent thru hulls and no check valves (except for vent lines). Good luck with the new setup and update your thread with the results.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-31-2017, 12:09 AM
MLA MLA is offline
MC Devotee
 
Join Date: May 2012
Boat: pontoon
Location: Lake Wylie Area
Posts: 1,206
A 1.5 thru-hull is more than adequate to supply 3 reversible pumps or 4 1200 aerator pumps. Having sad that, cannot speak for the rest of the plumbing schematic. With a good downstream design, there will be no flow difference with this setup compared to each pump on its own thru hull.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-31-2017, 06:41 PM
pondo pondo is offline
TT Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Boat: 2005 Mastercraft X-2
Location: VA
Posts: 75
Basically your pressure loss through the 3/4" pipe is nearly 3 times as much as the pressure loss in the 1-1/2" pipe per linear foot of pipe with all 3 ballast pumps on.

What ballast pump are you using? Maybe I can find a pump curve on it and really give you a good feel on your fill time.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-31-2017, 07:39 PM
Soder's Avatar
Soder Soder is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Boat: 2004 X-30 MCX
Location: Utah
Posts: 108
pondo, my ballast pump is the Jabsco Ballast Pump Model: 18220-7123 - See pic

PS - After using my incredibly myopic brainpower for a few minutes, I figured out why MasterCraft went down to the 3/4" hose. The input/vent on the factory hard tanks are 3/4" barbed fittings.
Attached Images
 
__________________
2004 X-30 5.7L MCX
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-31-2017, 07:47 PM
Soder's Avatar
Soder Soder is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Boat: 2004 X-30 MCX
Location: Utah
Posts: 108
OK, let's have some more fun. As I'm adding some ballast bags, (thanks WakeMakers) I see that everything is plumbed with 1" hose to the pump and then reduced to 3/4" coming out of the pump. (See very bottom of my picture above) I want to plumb 1" hose all the way to the ballast bags. Checking the math and assuming my surface area theory is close to correct as pondo said it was...:

Surface areas:
1 1/2" = 1.77 in/sq
1" = 0.79 in/sq
3/4" = 0.44 in/sq

So, if I leave my KGB on 3/4" hose, I now have (0.79 + 0.79 + 0.44) = 2.02 > 1.77

Thus I could keep my rear bags on the same 1 1/2" thru hull but should add another 1" thru hull for my KGB and upgrade that line to a 1" hose as well. But while I'm adding a thru hull, I might as well add 2 of them, right?
__________________
2004 X-30 5.7L MCX
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ballast, diameter, manifold, pumps, thru hull

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:57 PM.