Go Back   TeamTalk > Maintenance Tips, How-tos and Refurbishing Topics > General / Other

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-20-2013, 10:19 PM
Barefoot Tom's Avatar
Barefoot Tom Barefoot Tom is offline
TT Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Boat: 1991 Mastcraft Barefoot 200
Location: Midwest
Posts: 8
Would MC still retrofit hydro rails to a 1998 190?

I was looking at a 1998 30th anniversary 190 on Boat Trader, but there no hydro rails on the photo. What would it cost to have those installed? Is it essential for boat handling characteristics? Thanks, Tom
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-20-2013, 10:27 PM
jakethebt's Avatar
jakethebt jakethebt is offline
MC Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Boat: '96 Prostar 205 LT-1
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 583
I don't know what the answer is but the can of worms has been opened. I wondered the same thing myself when I was looking at a 30th too. I don't think they are absolutely necessary. I believe the purpose was to add a bit more lift to the back of the boat when underway. This reason never made much sense to me as I thought the issue was a somewhat ineffective rudder at some rare and goofy situations. I believe it was officially called chine lock.
__________________
1996 Prostar 205 LT-1
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-20-2013, 10:53 PM
rodltg2 rodltg2 is offline
MC Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Boat: SN196
Location: Rocklin, CA
Posts: 6,023
Send a message via AIM to rodltg2
Don't really know what the effect of each band aid individually did. The whole " fix" included rails , t rudder and fourth tracking fin. From what I gather the t rudder fixed the chime lock but reduced tracking and increased spray. So the rails and fourth fins were added. I may be totally wrong. Either way if your not on a private ski lake , you should be good to go regardless.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-21-2013, 06:02 AM
petermegan's Avatar
petermegan petermegan is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Boat: 2000 Matercraft Prostar 190, LTR330,powerslot,PP,heater
Location: South Australia
Posts: 477
My 2000 Prostar has them and they would easily be hand made if you were keen to add them. Wonder whether you could actually notice the difference in handling and wake though.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-21-2013, 07:37 AM
Barefoot Tom's Avatar
Barefoot Tom Barefoot Tom is offline
TT Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Boat: 1991 Mastcraft Barefoot 200
Location: Midwest
Posts: 8
How do you think the wake would compare to my 1991 Barefoot 200? It is all I have skied behind since 1996! I am trying to decide about staying with what I have vs a change. Any insights?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-22-2013, 10:36 AM
Kevin 89MC's Avatar
Kevin 89MC Kevin 89MC is offline
MC Devotee
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Boat: 1989 Prostar 190, 351 Indmar
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 1,083
My brother in law bought a new 1998 Prostar that we skied on for at least a full season before he had the mods done. That was when I was just getting into course skiing, probably 28-32 MPH at 15 off. I seem to recall not noticing any significant difference. Either way it was a better wake than my '89. It drove so differently than mine I did not notice much of a change from behind the wheel either. Not to stir the pot on this hull, but his boat has always been, and still is, a great boat to ski behind and drive.
I have never skied behind a barefoot boat, but my guess is the wake may be a little bigger with the inboard, but it will track much better. They are great boats, don't hesitate to buy it!
Good luck.
__________________
1989 ProStar 190 with "Safe T Top", 351 Ford, GT 40 heads painted Ford Blue, Elec. Ign, 1:1, 720 hours, 4 blade prop, PP 6.5, removable platform brackets, custom color from factory, hot water shower, Boat Buddy & LED lights on trailer
2010 D3 Z7, 2 @ 32 off, 34 mph so far
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-22-2013, 10:41 AM
east tx skier's Avatar
east tx skier east tx skier is offline
MC Hero
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Boat: 1998 Ski Nautique
Location: End of my rope.
Posts: 25,287
Nearly all the 1998 190s out there will have the foiled rudder and the fourth skeg. The hydrorails were standard equipment in 1999 and were made available as add-ons to the 1998 190s. I know Farmer Ted had his added after the fact, but that was not recent.

My understanding is that the hydrorails had nothing to do with handling characteristics. Their function was to soften the wake a bit. Farmer Ted could certainly give you a good idea about the before and after results of the hydrorails.

I would suggest calling Rambo Marine, Charlotte Ski Boats, and Bay Area Water Sports. Any of those dealers could have some lying around or could give you a reasonable idea on the likelihood of your finding some.

Good luck.
__________________
Previous: 1993 Prostar 205

Red 1998 Closed Bow Ski Boat, Ford 351, 310 hp, Acme 4 blade, Perfect Pass SG.

FAQ


Tyler Ski Club


To me, this forum is about love of inboard boats. It is about the sharing of information and, on a good day, some humor. It is not about post count, brand of boat, or any other superfluous labels that lend themselves to a false sense of superiority. Please, respect one another, try to pass on accurate information, and keep your eye on the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-23-2013, 09:20 AM
Barefoot Tom's Avatar
Barefoot Tom Barefoot Tom is offline
TT Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Boat: 1991 Mastcraft Barefoot 200
Location: Midwest
Posts: 8
Thanks for all the tips. They were helpful.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 AM.