Random Pictures

[boogie420]

gotcha.....whoa nelly, I'm only 32 she's a cougar to me!

[boogie420]

and the tank

[Ben]

Stars and stripes and socks.

[CantRepeat]

Totally needs a Nikon around his neck.

[pap]

There is a reason the flag code states: "No part of the flag should ever be used as a costume or athletic uniform"

[2RLAKE]

Segway riding in Paris two weeks ago ... first two hours were awesome .... last hour poured ... Linda rode with one hand and the other holding her umbrella!

[CantRepeat]

Originally Posted by pap

There is a reason the flag code states: "No part of the flag should ever be used as a costume or athletic uniform"

Really? I'd like to see it else I call BS.

[f925]

Originally Posted by boogie420

and the tank

Beautiful setup! What is your live stock?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Spork]

Originally Posted by pap

There is a reason the flag code states: "No part of the flag should ever be used as a costume or athletic uniform"

I'm pretty sure his shorts did not start out as an actual US Flag, therefore the specific line you quoted is invalid and does not apply..

CRS-13
Use of the Flag in Jewelry, Commercial Products, Wearing
Apparel, and Advertising
The Flag Code addresses the impropriety of using the flag as an article of
personal adornment, a design on items of temporary use, and item of clothing.48 The
evident purpose of these suggested restraints is to limit the commercial or common
usage of the flag and, thus, maintain its dignity. The 1976 amendments to the Code
recognized the wearing of a flag patch or pin on the left side (near the heart) of
uniforms of military personnel, firemen, policemen, and members of patriotic
CRS-14
49 P.L. 94-344, § 1(16).
50 4 U.S.C. § 8(i).
51 See, United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 (1990) and Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397
(1989).
52 See, e.g., Halter v. Nebraska, 205 U.S. 34 (1907).
53 4 U.S.C. § 3.
54 See, e.g., Central Hudson Gas and Electric Co. V. PSC, 447 U.S. 557 (1980).
55 Aug. 21, 1959, 29 F.R. 6865; see 4 U.S.C. §§ 1-2.
56 P.L. 109-243.
organizations.49 The Code also states that the flag should never be used for
advertising purposes in any manner whatsoever.50
While wearing the colors may be in poor taste and offensive to many, it is
important to remember that the Flag Code is intended as a guide to be followed on
a purely voluntary basis to insure proper respect for the flag. It is, at least,
questionable whether statutes placing civil or criminal penalties on the wearing of
clothing bearing or resembling a flag could be constitutionally enforced in light of
Supreme Court decisions in the area of flag desecration.51
In the past, the Supreme Court has held that states may restrict use of pictures
of the flag on commercial products.52 There is a federal criminal prohibition on the
use of the flag for advertising purposes in the District of Columbia.53 While
commercial speech does not receive the full protection of the First Amendment,54

[Spork]

pap when is your account going to be fixed your still showing as a guest...