Go Back   TeamTalk > General MasterCraft Topics > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-01-2013, 10:45 AM
scott023's Avatar
scott023 scott023 is offline
MC Master Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Boat: 2008 X45 Switch L18
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnE View Post
Why not just buy an X-series?. Little difference between that and the old maristar series anyway since you want a tower.
Took the words right out of my mouth. Only real difference, after the tower, is the built in ballast.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-01-2013, 11:02 AM
jafo9's Avatar
jafo9 jafo9 is offline
MC Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Boat: 2002 X30 LTR
Location: Southeast
Posts: 628
Quote:
Originally Posted by kskonn View Post
...you would be looking at a bay liner or Cobalt of some sort.
that covers both ends of the I/O spectrum.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-01-2013, 12:18 PM
JohnE's Avatar
JohnE JohnE is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Boat: 1997 '190 LT-1/ 'slot
Location: Boston 'burbs
Posts: 8,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by scott023 View Post
Took the words right out of my mouth. Only real difference, after the tower, is the built in ballast.
At one point some electronics were standard on the X series and optional on the maristar/ prostar but afaik they all would be
the same today. (Not real up to speed on the newest electronics)

I know almost everyone wishes the electronics were optional these days.
__________________
'97 Prostar 190 - LT-1

Prior boats - 2009 X14, 2008 X14, 2005 197, 1988 Tristar 190, 1989 Prostar.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-01-2013, 10:14 PM
GoneBoatN's Avatar
GoneBoatN GoneBoatN is offline
MC Devotee
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Boat: 2010 X-15 w/MCX
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by scott023 View Post
Took the words right out of my mouth. Only real difference, after the tower, is the built in ballast.
I thought one of the other differences was the trim on the interior dash, glove box and wheel (maybe other areas too) - had that fake wood grain which I really disliked.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-02-2013, 11:18 AM
JohnE's Avatar
JohnE JohnE is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Boat: 1997 '190 LT-1/ 'slot
Location: Boston 'burbs
Posts: 8,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoneBoatN View Post
I thought one of the other differences was the trim on the interior dash, glove box and wheel (maybe other areas too) - had that fake wood grain which I really disliked.
Yes, a lot of little things which added up to not much IMO. I was talking major (again IMO) differences.
__________________
'97 Prostar 190 - LT-1

Prior boats - 2009 X14, 2008 X14, 2005 197, 1988 Tristar 190, 1989 Prostar.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-15-2013, 08:55 PM
Smitty's Avatar
Smitty Smitty is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Boat: 2005 Maristar 210, Red, MCX
Location: B-Town, Indiana
Posts: 254
I have to say that after being at a major boat show over the past weekend that I'm dissappointed in the direction of MC. The Maristar lineup was centered around family and class. I would have considered it to be the Cadillac of the watersports boats. But the newest lineup of MC boats are ridiculous and gaudy. I felt like the boats were screaming at me. Too much stuff for too little purpose. I see very little in the way of clean and classic taste. I know that the market is leaning to the extreme sports demographic, but you have to give choice to family. And not every family is looking for $20K of unnecessary crap that has the potential of malfunctioning and breaking at a moments notice. What ever happen to having a solid, reliable boat that you would have been proud to hand down to the next generation? Now every boat has a "wrap", tower or a ballast. Sorry, but MC has lost me. I'm proud of my '05 Maristar and I love the fact that it still has style and class without being loud, obnoxious and insufferable.

Someone from MC needs to take a walk over to the Colbalt or Chris Craft display. These are the only boats that still understand form and function combined with class and style. These boats look stylish without being over the top and probably retain their value far better than what MC, CC, or MB does these days. Don't even get me started on CC, because that was just down right bad IMO.

Call me old fashioned, but I come from a day where MC, Ski Supreme, CC, and American Skier set the standard for what water sports boats should be... Reliable, competitive, durable, stylish and legendary. Now, we feel the need to be everything but that... Obnoxious, loud, distasteful, and deplorable. You can have your Xwhatever for all I care. I love my Maristar and covet my Dad's '84 American Skier. I'm sad to see MC make such a poor marketing choice by eliminating the Maristar/V line up. Even if it just was a stripped down X/whatever. It still had class and styling and would be passed down to the next generation.

Maybe today's Xstar funky wraps, colors and graphics will be retro and cool in 30 years. Just like the Centurion "Tru trac II" will be retro never.
__________________
Life Is Good!

Last edited by Smitty; 01-15-2013 at 09:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-15-2013, 09:34 PM
Smitty's Avatar
Smitty Smitty is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Boat: 2005 Maristar 210, Red, MCX
Location: B-Town, Indiana
Posts: 254
Maristar Class
Attached Images
 
__________________
Life Is Good!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-15-2013, 09:55 PM
CruisinGA's Avatar
CruisinGA CruisinGA is online now
MC Devotee
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Boat: '01 X9 330HP
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty View Post
I have to say that after being at a major boat show over the past weekend that I'm dissappointed in the direction of MC. The Maristar lineup was centered around family and class. I would have considered it to be the Cadillac of the watersports boats. But the newest lineup of MC boats are ridiculous and gaudy. I felt like the boats were screaming at me. Too much stuff for too little purpose. I see very little in the way of clean and classic taste. I know that the market is leaning to the extreme sports demographic, but you have to give choice to family. And not every family is looking for $20K of unnecessary crap that has the potential of malfunctioning and breaking at a moments notice. What ever happen to having a solid, reliable boat that you would have been proud to hand down to the next generation? Now every boat has a "wrap", tower or a ballast. Sorry, but MC has lost me. I'm proud of my '05 Maristar and I love the fact that it still has style and class without being loud, obnoxious and insufferable.

Someone from MC needs to take a walk over to the Colbalt or Chris Craft display. These are the only boats that still understand form and function combined with class and style. These boats look stylish without being over the top and probably retain their value far better than what MC, CC, or MB does these days. Don't even get me started on CC, because that was just down right bad IMO.

Call me old fashioned, but I come from a day where MC, Ski Supreme, CC, and American Skier set the standard for what water sports boats should be... Reliable, competitive, durable, stylish and legendary. Now, we feel the need to be everything but that... Obnoxious, loud, distasteful, and deplorable. You can have your Xwhatever for all I care. I love my Maristar and covet my Dad's '84 American Skier. I'm sad to see MC make such a poor marketing choice by eliminating the Maristar/V line up. Even if it just was a stripped down X/whatever. It still had class and styling and would be passed down to the next generation.

Maybe today's Xstar funky wraps, colors and graphics will be retro and cool in 30 years. Just like the Centurion "Tru trac II" will be retro never.
You do know that you don't have to order all the options with a new boat, right?
__________________
Bailey
'02 X-9
Lake Blue Ridge
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-15-2013, 10:12 PM
EricB EricB is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Boat: 77 S&S, 1983 S&& PS, and now a 98 Anniversary S&S LT1 PS
Location: St. Paul, MN & Balsam Lake, WI
Posts: 414
Right on Smitty. I also agree with what you are saying.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-16-2013, 11:01 AM
Hogwild's Avatar
Hogwild Hogwild is offline
TT Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Boat: n/a
Location: South
Posts: 397
I have to agree with you smitty. I thought the cheesy graphics on the xstars were a small step in the wrong direction but the new mc boats are going way out there. It reminds me of the 80"s when neon was screaming at your eyes from every direction. Give me simple style and class any day. I wont be able to sell my pimped out graphics boat 10 years from now to anyone not tripping on lsd.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:09 PM.